Verified answer

The Progressive leaders working to crash the system understand it well. That's what they are working for.

Obama pushed bad loans & helped push up energy prices working for Soros years before we knew of him.

Obama worked to force banks to do bad loans, actually trained Acorn members to protest at homes and private offices in a threatening way and got government collusion in liberal cities to do it, working for Soros.

He also worked with Soros in the Joyce foundation where he funded the Climate Exchange scam that's dependent on the Cap & Trade Legislation a Democrat congress rejected so he's doing a regulatory end run attempt. This is the legislation that will cost the average American family $3000 a year in energy taxation basically though they call it differently, and pay trillions to those involved in the scam. Soros is the organizing entity for this, and other Rothschild agents like Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Maurice Strong, JP Morgan, and others invested are the same bunch who actively pushed up oil speculation that lead to the crash of the economy that lead to the banking crash with the bad loans many of those pushed, and were pushed by government mostly in the D party like Carter's Community Reinvestment act and other things and Clinton pushing up Fannie and Freddy and putting serious Democrat operatives in charge like Daily of the Chicago Mob / Mayor Daily's, Gorelick of the Clinton Gorelick Wall, Reins a Clinton Operative embezzler who stole 90 million from Fannie and was never charged.

Bush didn't crash the economy ... it was banking and fuel as a detonator to the banking bomb, and it was almost all set up by Progressives, including Obama who most don't know has been working for Soros (a man who specialized in crashing economies and has done in 6 other countries as well) Been working for Soros for many years before we knew him.

the alternative is to shrink public spending and raise taxes. those rules are quite unpopular and are extensively credited with destroying the a procedures eastern and eastern eu economies. the place the few that recovered the place people who flouted the guidelines. or no longer something must be achieved i.e. placed no funds interior the monetary gadget different than via the banks. This did no longer artwork in Japan with the aid of fact self assurance to eat under no circumstances arrived. if actuality be told it grew to grow to be so entrenched that Japan lost a decade to stagnance. Deficit spending besides the shown fact that dragged the international monetary gadget out of the Nineteen Thirties melancholy after the marketplace became allowed to staggering itself into that venture. yet its precise to stress. interior the long-term why ought to via f ucked

Are you aware that you question is proof positive that you have NO IDEA what liberal economics actually is?

(Much like many of your conservative brethren, you have simply accepted from your Tea Pot Overlords that it is "bad", without ever actually understanding what it IS....silly goose! Were you aware that most of what Ronald Reagan did is now considered "liberal economics"? Was Ronnie a "good thing" or a "bad thing" in your obviously high-quality, well-thought-out opinion?)

Daft Bugger!

When you can just print money and give it power.... The question isn't "are liberals aware?" The question is: When will the people realize, that this fiat money holds the place of "ideals," not capital?

Are conservatives aware that there's not enough money on earth to keep throwing at the rich?

Is there enough left to continue conservative economics of wars, tax cuts for the rich, and corporate welfare, and wall street deregulation considering that is the cause of 95% of our deficit?

What on Earth is "liberal economics"? I think you're pulling stuff out of your anus to make a point because you hate liberals and what they believe.

Also, where is your proof? Please show real professional proof and not something done by the Heritage foundation.

Do republicants/neocons/teafreaks realize there isn't enough money in the world to make them happy?

Yeah, the numbers show we need to cut entitlements and military spending, raise taxes, and spend more on infrastructure and education.

Guess were due for a per capita correction bro - including rich dudes...