No matter the age anyone under 18. is it fair for them to ever be tried, convicted, and sentenced as an adult? why or why not?
Update:so what exactly constitutes an "adult crime" how would you make that kind of distinction??
Copyright © 2024 EBIN.TIPS - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
It really depends on the child and the situation. I think there should be at least a year or two between the trial and the crime. This gives an oportunity to see if the child may be rehibilitated or not. You would be suprised how ever the worst can change with good therapy and medication if they are unbalanced.
HOWEVER, many kids today are from the "me, me, me, I aren't I awesome for no reason in particular" generation. They've been spoiled rotten and commit crimes again and again.
The way I see it, many of these kids have everything they need and more, they have wonderful parents, and still they behave this way. In these cases, I'm sorry, but if you want to do an adult crime you can pay adult time. Some kids really never learn... may be they need extra time to think about it.
thinking as objectively as i'm able i could assume that considering the fact that they are no longer of the age of criminal duty besides as no longer having won complete rights as an grownup citizen it may be unreasonable and sure, unfair. yet in many situations situations while considering sentencing judges are greater in contact in whether or no longer they're legally culpable - whether or no longer their age helps them the ability to tell suited from incorrect. So whilst that's unfair to limit the rights and privileges of a guy or woman yet nonetheless call for they proceed to be basically as in charge, it's going to make little distinction in every physique's recommendations by way of fact all of us comprehend that even a 14 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous of regular psychological and emotional potential is conscious of that homicide is inaccurate. however the question is whether or no longer or no longer they could subjectively comprehend the consequences of their very own strikes to the comparable volume as an grownup, so i could disagree that youngsters could desire to be tried as adults, yet I additionally disagree that if one commits a homicide whilst underage that they could desire to be gently sentenced. a demanding question to respond to, in line with hazard the answer could desire to lie interior the reducing of the age at which persons legally obtain complete rights and privileges.
You do the crime you do the time. Murder is murder. What do you expect...no recess for a week?
Fair, what does fair mean??????????
Is it fair if a 17 year old man rapes and murders your 7 year old sister???????
Please enlighten the rest of the world about fair???
Can you do that???
Why or Why Not??????????
depends on the crime
Why or why not??????
OK! for example
if you stole a pencil then NO.
if you kill someone with the pencil then YES.
nope