Verified answer

Yes, because we actually have to do something, or demonstrate real results to keep our jobs, not like politicians who just take payoffs from the largest lobby group to get re-elected

Sure. It's a free market economy and nobody should be able to tell a company that there's a limit on what they can pay someone. If I own the company, I should have the right to overpay people - even if it's totally wasting the money, that's my decision, since it's my company and my money. People who think it should all be 'fair' have the right to vote Socialist and good luck with that. LOL

You advise absolute privatization of authorities? actually no longer! If the authorities is administered like a company, then who's gonna end that company from playing dirty? If some thing, it truly is going to be any incorrect way round: more beneficial businesses ought to grow to be public, in order to provide amenities to the voters and promote wide-spread wellbeing.

Yes, the US is based on free enterprise. The ability for a company to pay anyone what they see fit is what makes us free and prosperous. If not, we would be closer to Communist or Socialist countries.

The President should serve for Free, as JFK did. He donated his salary to charity. What a wonderful idea..all public servants at the congressional level DONATE back to America.

You're dealing with commercial enterprise pal!!

You buy the "widget" company makes money!

The President is a governmental operation...not commercial!

But...look at the "commercial" enterprises political figures are involved in PRIOR to their election!

Yes they should. This is still a capitalist country and when we start talking about limiting wages people need to take a good look at themselves.

Everyone should be 'allowed' to make whatever the market will bear.

You make as much money as someone is willing to pay you. If you aren't worth that amount then fire the guy.

Yeah, it's called capitalism...