Verified answer

I am not sure being a "liberal" is a bad thing, and clearly has some kind of different meaning to you Americans. Anyway, whatever the point is you are trying to make, the fact is that fossil fuels do cause environmental damage and most serious scientists accept this view. But the benefits it has given us over the years are undeniable. Not just oil, but natural gas and coal have all helped get us where we are today.

As for a world without cars, there are still many people in the world who have never seen a car. More than half the population of the planet have never seen a telephone, and the majority have never heard of Jesus. In light of this, I think life without a car comes naturally to most human beings, and those who have never encountered one would find life with a car unbearably stressful, not to mention expensive.

We'd be living a lot closer together, concentrating in big cities. The tourism industry would be practically non-existent. Many of the advances in agriculture, technology, medicine or standard of living would not be possible without the personal automobile. Look at countries where the automobile is either just being accepted or has not been accepted (i.e. unaffordable), to see what life is like.

Humans were given a brain to be curious with, invent things and attempt to better their lives. Because of their supreme intelligence above the animals, humans are able to survive as a very successful species. Along with this comes the negative aspects such as damage to the environment. But humans adapt and learn (we hope). if God wanted humans to not harm the environment, he would have mad humans dumb as animals. And we wouldn't be having this conversation then. We'd be scrounging for food, and pooping everywhere like our wild animal friends.

the position do you imagine Hydrogen comes from? Hydrogen desires to be separated from regardless of chemical elements it truly is hooked as a lot as. you won't be able to discover HYDROGEN certainly in a state the position it will be utilized for the chemical reaction. HYDROGEN favor to be manufacturered and the chemical procedure to extract hydrogen is in many situations VERY capacity intensive. wager the position they'll be getting the capacity to extract all that hydrogen. they'll be BURNING FOSSIL FUELS, pollution so it isn't pollution free. possibly pollution will be localized, yet a thoughts from pollution free. As to at the same time as, truly, the technologies has picked up really lots because gas expenditures are finally accomplishing a $$$ volume that makes the hydrogen gasoline cellular automobiles a doable selection. i'd assume at the same time as gas expenditures hit $7/gallon it truly is going to be value-sensible for human beings to judge a hydrogen gasoline cellular vehicle. yet have you ever see the present hydrogen gasoline cellular automobiles? they are small. a lot smaller than some thing utilized by utilising gas automobiles. automobiles of that length with a similar gas engine can really get 50mpg-60mpg. (shop in concepts the Geo Metro marketed at 57mpg) i trust with goverment subsidized classes regardless of the indisputable fact that, gasoline cellular automobiles will likely have a danger at the same time as gas reaches $7/gallon.

We Were much better off; who needs all these crazy people driving around erratically; it reminds me of a bunch of "bugs" in the Kitchen, when someone turns the light on....!!

I think the world would have been more physically fit. Everyone would have either walked or rode bike's everywhere...

life as we know it would be much simpler to live and much cheaper.

We'd all have blisters on our feet.

We would all be waist deep in horseshit.