Verified answer

Totally agree. They should use playback and check before making rash decisions like the England one. I also noticed about Tevez and am REALLY annoyed. Also agree about Ghana, they were clearly just as good as Uruguay and if Uruguay hadn't had a handball it would have gone in and they would have scored.

Think the problem is that the game is that old and the more and more you change the rules the more it takes away the original game. But on the other hand times are changing and with all the improvements to the equipment and training then yes some rules need to be looked at.

Personally I am a strong believer that there should be a 4th official involved now. The game is too quick and too many mistakes are being made. Also with the amount of money at stake sometimes it can be a very costly decision. By the time the players have finished arguing with the ref everyone watching at home has already seen multiple replays from many angles, all it then takes is an earpiece and microphone to tell the ref, yes he was offside, yes it was a goal, no it wasn't a foul.

But then again it would take some of the excitement out of the game and you would have less to talk about, it's all swings and roundabouts, some weeks you get the decision others you don't. It's all what the beauty of football is all about.

I agree with instant reply but why has the MLB not included it they also had a recent case where a pitcher would have pitched a perfect game but didnt.

I agree with everything you said EXCEPT I adamantly disagree with a definite goal for something that doesnt pass the line. That can't won't and should never be considered a goal!

I agree with the "handling on the line should be a a goal" idea.

I always have.

It's a bit like a penalty try in rugby and is the only fair way to handle it.

England are always being cheated at the world cup. Every time. Somethink has to change.

Fifa have changed the rules. I witnessed a change of goalie in the match earlier tonight in mid play.