Verified answer

If you want a perscription for skyrocketing medical bills, this is it.

Ron Paul want to do away completely with income taxes! How can he give you a tax credit if you aren't paying taxes? The guys is nothing but disjointed sound bites. My question to you is. Do you really like Ron Paul or are you just another Lib pretending to so he is emboldened to run as an independent and split the GOP vote once he loses the primaries? It worked with Ross Perot right...

labken -- I do comprehend out of your different postings which you're anti-Ron Paul, so unsure in case you made your bring about the previous looking out the solutions to questions like the only you're asking here. besides, Ron Paul's tax plan isn't basically excise taxes. it is that AND consumer costs. consumer costs, examples: a million. The Federal tax on gas is how the government will pay for roads (R.Paul stated that it is abused, they carry about mutually better than what's mandatory for roads, and use the surplus for different unrelated issues.) 2. Passport costs - you pay a fee for the utility and beaurocracy 3. Stamps - pay to run the placed up workplace / mail provider 4. Federal costs on your airline tickets: pay for air site visitors administration .. those forms of are basically some examples of consumer costs that are presently in result. Then excise taxes conceal typical costs no longer coated by way of consumer costs. the traditional result become quoted in some interviews. earnings tax represents 40% of all federal sales presently gathered. Ron Paul plans to get rid of this fullyyt. So result: Federal gross sales drops 40% Federal spending is decrease 50% (Ron Paul recommends reducing it in a million/2) Spending would be decrease better than taxes, remaining out the deficit. Now human beings would disagree with this: once you're a socialist and choose super government. classes, you mustn't vote for Ron Paul. additionally, in case you have self belief we could consistently have super militia campaigns, you are able to vote for somebody else. yet his financial coverage does not recommend any form of deficit, or any kind of unsound scam to make human beings experience solid. there is no longer something obscure approximately what he needs to do, in case you basically learn the main important factors. it fairly is fairly close-minded to think of that governments won't be able to exist with taxing earnings. Many states interior the U. S. have not have been given any earnings tax: e.g. Nevada (final I heard they have been booming), NH, WY, Alaska, Florida, Texas, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington ... and previous to 1913, earnings tax become no longer even portion of the U. S. shape.

But this would only pertain to those who are uninsured. I have health insurance and I don't see how it would benefit people like myself.

That is a very good idea. Kills two birds with one stone.

All tax cuts are welcome by this citizen. Can he get a "do nothing" congress to go for it?

you bet ye.