Verified answer

Because they think him being a former tennis player makes him able to give a better insight ...

however I think he adds as much insight as a dog at a vegetarian support group ...

average player ... below average " expert"

By that logic no one could ever criticise anyone unless they were better at the thing they were criticising them for. So you can never criticise sportsmen, including Henman, because they're better than you at it and so you don't have a right to an opinion. You can never criticise films, because the director is probably a better director than you and so you don't have a right to an opinion. You can't criticise politicians, because they are probably better at it than you so you don't have a right to an opinion.

Henman was ranked number 4 in the world at one point so I think he probably knows what he's talking about.

Do you know what, I was wondering the exact same thing the other day, Tim 'semi final' Henman should be replaced, hes also a crap commentator aswell.

Are you saying you have to be better than someone to give them advice?

Then what right did/do Alex Fergusen, Wenger and Mourinho have to tell their players what to do?

Why do you criticise Man Utd players then?

totally agree..the fcuking stuck up English **** with his fcuking boring upper class **** parents

He's the best we've got.