I think Iran should be free to have nukes. Why shouldn't they? Look at the nukes that surround Iran...The Chinese are there, the Indians are there, the Pakistani's are there, the Israeli's are there, the United States is there. Having nukes would give Iran greater respect and would make Israel think twice before provoking a nuclear power, therefore one can see why Iran might want a nuke. Also Iran having nukes is no threat to American national security. The Soviet's had tens of thousands of nuclear missiles with intercontinental range pointed at America for over 40 years! Iran don't have an airforce that can come and invade us. I honestly think its stupid to think of Iran as a threat, they are not stupid. They know the USA armed forces can demolish them in minutes.
I doubt many people would want another drawn out war in the middle east, for absolutely no reason. Are we even in a financial situation to wage war on Iran? We have no right to invade a sovereign state, defy our constitution and international law.
Also, Israel is not a NATO ally, so we have no need to back them up. Why should we? Israel should be able to defend itself. This is why we need Ron Paul in the White House, asap!
However, it does make me sick to hear that humanity hasn't learnt its lesson. My grandfather was just 19 when he went off to Normandy in 1944. That generation, our grandparents, they fought on the beaches, gave up so much. They defeated Hitler, brought us out of the great depression. That generation sent a man to the moon, fought successfully for civil rights and brought down the iron curtain. We never learn our lessons. War is the most horrible thing in human history, we must avoid it at all costs. As the UN Charter, article 1 states, the purpose of the UN is to, "save succeeding generations from the scourge of war , which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind".
War is never good. We will do all we can to prevent war, especially WW3.
i in my view wish no longer. i do no longer think of the u . s . is waiting to get right into a conflict with Iran. the end results of Iraq exhibits how helpful it would be. a minimum of Iraq allegedly had human rights violations and weapons of mass destruction that it grow to be prohibited from having. As stupid at they may be, I doubt the U. S. government is dumb sufficient to anticipate something different than a massacre and international huge destablization from outright conflict interior the middle East. Such action may be tantamount to a well-known-day marketing campaign from the Muslim perspective. i'm hoping that quickly all communities can lay down hands and notice the follly of on-going hostilities. i do no longer see Israel making any friends in this contemporary conflict. that is starting to be thoroughly absurd.
No, Romney is simply pointing out the ineffective team Obama and Clinton have been with respect to the Iran policy. The link says nothing about Romney wanting to go to war.
When you live in a country, you get benefits and rights but you also get responsibilities and duties. It doesn't matter who will have to go, whoever it is, that's who it is. The antiwar cowards also ask who will go. When you were kids, others have to go for you. So if war happens now or in the future, you will go if you are in that age group. When you are old, the young and able will go. And life rolls on.
LOL...it will be the same Rich Man reason he gave 4 years ago...all five of his silver spoon sons will serve their country by helping their Daddy lose another presidential election.
Obama went after everybody but them, the ones who live to see us dead. You will someday answer to Iran and I am thinking you will wished someone would have taken them out. And why does a president have to send their kids any more than you or I?
A-Jad is insane; he is a threat to the people of Iran and throughout the world in general. When the people of Iran died reaching out for freedom, they were abandoned. A-Jad has got to go - one way or the other.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I think Iran should be free to have nukes. Why shouldn't they? Look at the nukes that surround Iran...The Chinese are there, the Indians are there, the Pakistani's are there, the Israeli's are there, the United States is there. Having nukes would give Iran greater respect and would make Israel think twice before provoking a nuclear power, therefore one can see why Iran might want a nuke. Also Iran having nukes is no threat to American national security. The Soviet's had tens of thousands of nuclear missiles with intercontinental range pointed at America for over 40 years! Iran don't have an airforce that can come and invade us. I honestly think its stupid to think of Iran as a threat, they are not stupid. They know the USA armed forces can demolish them in minutes.
I doubt many people would want another drawn out war in the middle east, for absolutely no reason. Are we even in a financial situation to wage war on Iran? We have no right to invade a sovereign state, defy our constitution and international law.
Also, Israel is not a NATO ally, so we have no need to back them up. Why should we? Israel should be able to defend itself. This is why we need Ron Paul in the White House, asap!
However, it does make me sick to hear that humanity hasn't learnt its lesson. My grandfather was just 19 when he went off to Normandy in 1944. That generation, our grandparents, they fought on the beaches, gave up so much. They defeated Hitler, brought us out of the great depression. That generation sent a man to the moon, fought successfully for civil rights and brought down the iron curtain. We never learn our lessons. War is the most horrible thing in human history, we must avoid it at all costs. As the UN Charter, article 1 states, the purpose of the UN is to, "save succeeding generations from the scourge of war , which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind".
War is never good. We will do all we can to prevent war, especially WW3.
U.S. is not too stupid to do that. Iran has some strategical tools (as oils price) and true alleys.
Israel is too weak to invade Iran. Zionists cannot win a war with a little Jahadi group like Hamas!
That is just a silly propaganda to cover 99% movement news and Iraq retreat.
i in my view wish no longer. i do no longer think of the u . s . is waiting to get right into a conflict with Iran. the end results of Iraq exhibits how helpful it would be. a minimum of Iraq allegedly had human rights violations and weapons of mass destruction that it grow to be prohibited from having. As stupid at they may be, I doubt the U. S. government is dumb sufficient to anticipate something different than a massacre and international huge destablization from outright conflict interior the middle East. Such action may be tantamount to a well-known-day marketing campaign from the Muslim perspective. i'm hoping that quickly all communities can lay down hands and notice the follly of on-going hostilities. i do no longer see Israel making any friends in this contemporary conflict. that is starting to be thoroughly absurd.
No, Romney is simply pointing out the ineffective team Obama and Clinton have been with respect to the Iran policy. The link says nothing about Romney wanting to go to war.
We've heard all the lies against Iran before.
Ever heard of a place called Iraq?
When you live in a country, you get benefits and rights but you also get responsibilities and duties. It doesn't matter who will have to go, whoever it is, that's who it is. The antiwar cowards also ask who will go. When you were kids, others have to go for you. So if war happens now or in the future, you will go if you are in that age group. When you are old, the young and able will go. And life rolls on.
Quit asking that stupid and idiotic question.
LOL...it will be the same Rich Man reason he gave 4 years ago...all five of his silver spoon sons will serve their country by helping their Daddy lose another presidential election.
Obama went after everybody but them, the ones who live to see us dead. You will someday answer to Iran and I am thinking you will wished someone would have taken them out. And why does a president have to send their kids any more than you or I?
A-Jad is insane; he is a threat to the people of Iran and throughout the world in general. When the people of Iran died reaching out for freedom, they were abandoned. A-Jad has got to go - one way or the other.
Hes simply trying to score brownie points with the warmongers.